Thou Shalt Compost

Happy Mandatory Composting Day!

Wednesday marks the much anticipated (at least on this blog) debut of San Francisco’s non-elective composting program. All households and businesses must participate in the 3-bin system, one of which is a green cart for food scraps and other organics.

Sarcasm! Photo by tim parkinson via creative commonsThe preparations for this day have been rather feverish, recently, and it seems like the city is ready. The question is: are its citizens?

The legislation provides potential fines for noncompliance to give the program some teeth. Yet, there’s a moratorium on fines until at least July 2011 and even then they’ll be capped at $100 for households.

What do you make of this kind of enforced green behavior? Too heavy-handed and will prompt a backlash? Or necessary to keep the most food out of the landfill?

October 21, 2009 | Posted in Composting, Waste Stream | Comments closed

BOGOFL

I tweeted about this, but it deserves a quick post, too. Behold:

UK retailer Tesco will soon offer Buy One Get One Free–Later. The shift comes in the name of Avoiding household waste with foods like produce and dairy items.

When the 2-for-1 promotion is with perishable items, shoppers will receive a voucher for the free item to be used later. I believe they don’t have to wait if they want their free item that day.

I wonder what shoppers will think of this idea? Will other grocers follow suit? I suppose the latter will depend on the former.

Anyway, I’m jazzed about it. Mostly, I’m enthused that retailers are starting to become part of the solution.

October 20, 2009 | Posted in International, Supermarket | Comments closed

Presenting Waste

I’m now in Denver, getting ready to give a presentation at the American Dietetic Association conference. It’s exciting being here with so many other people who think about food all day. Usually, it’s just my dog and me.

In addition to checking out what a bunch of nutritionists eat, image by eschipul via creative commonsI’m curious to see how they fare with plate waste. I’ll be keeping my eyes peeled.

The theme of Tuesday’s talk is “Promoting Food Security by Reducing Waste.” I’m presenting with Andy Sarjahani, who you may recall from the Virginia Tech traylessness trial, way back when. (Tech went trayless the following Fall.)
After a year as the sustainability coordinator at VT, Andy is now working on a master’s in sustainable food systems at Montana State and doing a little community-supported gardening on the side.

We plan to rock the ADA tomorrow at 8 a.m. Thankfully, that’s 8 a.m. Mountain Time.

October 19, 2009 | Posted in Personal | Comments closed

Friday Buffet

With a zero waste policy on the way in Britain, the discussion continues to focus on the number of bins per home. It will probably come down to value paid for source-separated recyclables vs. nuisance. Also, and here’s the waste industry’s reaction.

— —

I don’t think you’re a terrible person, Rachel, but I do hope you compost this fairly frequent waste.

— —

50 Ways to Leave Your Lover food unwasted.photo by ahiset via creative commons

— —

UK Secretary of State for Environment Hilary Benn recently did a Web chat to discuss the new waste policy. There’s reference to pesky foxes and this nice exchange:

John Whitworth: What is your response to the accusation that you have misappropriated the “Zero Waste” label? You policy is at best “25% Waste” even if you consider incineration a form of reuse.

Hilary replies: Crumbs, it’s only 9.45am and I have been accused of misappropriation !!! Zero waste is what we are aiming for, John, and never let perfection get in the way of progress…..  

— —

From Plymouth, England: food waste pledges. Now that is an interesting idea.

— —

Here’s a decent digest on Aussie food waste and recovery. Good to hear the Salvos are getting some help with their food supply.

— —

Finally, if I lived in Washington, I’d try to see the dumpster diving documentary Dive! at the Gig Harbor Film Festival on Saturday. Let me know if you get to it.

October 16, 2009 | Posted in Friday Buffet, Household, International, Restaurant | Comments closed

Waste Revolution (coming soon)

Bold stuff coming from the UK.

Yesterday, the Secretary of State for the Environment Hilary Benn announced plans to turn Britain into a zero waste nation. Eventually.

Benn pointed to a goal of diverting 75 percent of household waste from landfill by 2019. In addressing food waste, Benn alluded to the fast-progressing (in the UK) anaerobic digestion: 

We need to rethink how we view and treat waste in the UK. Why do we send valuable items like aluminium and food waste to landfill when we can turn them into new cans and renewable energy?

That’s an important question, considering the volume of waste. As noted at the way bottom of the same link, the average UK home discards £400 of good food annually. 

photo by s2artDespite speculation from this less-than-enthusiastic site, there were no specifics on when food may be banned outright from landfills, but a confirmation that it’s in the works:

“Why do we allow food waste, wood, cans, paper and glass to go into landfill at all when we already know there are other ways in which they can be used?” [Benn] said. “Banning landfill of those products is going to be the next stage.”

In any case, this is all exciting doings. The one downside–the possibility of five, count ’em–five, roller bins.

UPDATE: It looks like Benn and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will release a study on how a landfill ban would work in early November.

October 14, 2009 | Posted in Energy, International, Stats, Waste Stream | Comments closed

Your Opinion, Please

I have a very serious question to ask, people. It’s about spelling. The spelling of doggy bags. Or is it doggie bags?

Here’s a link to the poll (I had problems embedding it…).

The reason I’m asking is because I need to decide how to spell this term in my book. Since the dictionary lists both as correct and I’m not partial to either, I thought I’d turn it over to you discerning readers. Did you ever imagine having such a major impact on an acutal book?!

FYI, I’ve cleared this with my editor. And barring a publishing house copy editor with a vendetta against one version, your decision will determine the way it’ll appear in print. 

Web 2.0, meet the printed word. Printed word, Web 2.0. And please feel free to comment below on your selection, reasoning or opinions on spelling or life in general.

October 12, 2009 | Posted in Restaurant | Comments closed

Friday Buffet

Sky Vegetables–where do I invest? While they don’t have a roof-top garden operating yet, part of their plan is to compost and use food scraps from the building on which the garden sits. 

— —

photo by copepodo via creative commonsSome folks in Vermont are hoping to show why it’s called the Green Mountain State, as they’re looking into creating energy from food waste, via anaerobic digestion (a biodigester)

— —

It’s one thing to declare mandatory composting in SF. Preparing for it is a whole ‘nother.

— —

All kinds of great names at play here: The Lumberjack, the student newspaper at Humboldt State (Calif.), wrote about Food For People. No mistaking what that Eureka, Calif., group does.

— —

Coming soon, a Wasted Food first–a poll! Keep your eyes peeled for a vote next week, provided I can get my act together and figure out a voting mechanism.

October 9, 2009 | Posted in College, Composting, Energy, Food Recovery, Friday Buffet | Comments closed

Flying the Wasteful Skies

Ruggero Da Ros wrote me recently with a link to his article, in Italian on airline food waste. Since he was kind enough to provide the translation, I thought I’d post it here. In addition to raising the interesting topic of airborne food waste, it’s a nice memento of the days when American airlines served food (for free). 

Remember these?  Photo by Yuichi Sakuraba via creative commons.Ruggero’s piece raises a tough question–should food costs be included in ticket prices or charged onboard. It seems that the latter works better in terms of avoiding waste. 

While selling food onboard leaves airlines with no way of knowing how many meals they’ll need, from what I’ve seen, they’re happy to err on the side of running out–a true rarity in food service!

So think of that argument, and Ruggero’s piece, the next time you start to grouse about how planes are nickel and diming us…I know I will. (Or at least focus on the checked bag fees, instead.)

 

WASTING FOOD AND PLASTICS ON AIRLINES

Vacations are over. Many of us have been travelling by air to distant places. Have you ever noticed how much food is wasted? On the flights that are not low cost and that last more than an hour, a meal and a snack are served on trays in various plastic containers wrapped with plastic film. Hardly anybody refuses them. Some might not be hungry or have no intention to eat them, nonetheless they accept them hoping to find something to their taste or because it is included in the ticket fare.

A lot of people open the wrapping, smell the food or taste just a little bit of it, others eat something, only a few of them eat everything. On long distance flights almost two complete meals are served, one just after taking off and the other before landing.

Is all this food really necessary? In the low cost flights the food is paid apart from the travel fare and few people buy it, yet these companies are successful. We might then wonder why the other airline companies don’t give the opportunity to choose between a fare with meals and one without, and with a lower price? Doing so the exaggerated use of plastic containers and wrapping would be reduced, the cost of the airline tickets would also be reduced and, above all, the waste of enormous quantities of food would thus be avoided.

Let’s consider two calculations. On an intercontinental flight with 300 people 600 meals are served and, if they were to be paid, one can consider that at least 400 meals and 80 kg of plastic would be saved. In Europe only, around 800 million passengers fly every year; supposing that only one meal every 10 travellers could be saved, it would add up to the enormous figure of 80 million wasted meals. This would be enough to feed over 200,000 inhabitants of the poorer countries for a year and this figure would become millions if we extended this calculation to the whole world.

Considering that the aeroplane remains the most polluting transport means, indeed a trip between Europe and America of two people contributes, as far as gas and electricity consumption is concerned, to the same consumption as an average family in one whole year, thus let’s avoid wasting if we really cannot avoid flying.

18 September 2009
Ruggero Da Ros
Vittorio Veneto – Italy

October 7, 2009 | Posted in Airline | Comments closed

Wasted Food at the Movies

I’m torn here. Whip It looks like a pretty good flick and I’d probably go see it (if I had any time to see movies). Then again, it contains this horrible food fight.

image courtesy of flare via creative commonsNot surprisingly, I don’t love a food fight (in theory or in practice). While I try to have a sense of humor to food waste, I just don’t see the point here.

In my opinion, it’s not funny. Couldn’t the two leads just duke it out without the entire restaurant throwing food? Unless casting of comestibles furthers the character development of one of the “Hurl Scouts,” it seems entirely unnecessary. Am I the wet blanket here?

Drew Barrymore, the yeller of “Fooood Fiiiiiiiiiiight!!!!,” also directed the movie. Come on, Drew, you’re better than that. And, here’s to hoping you got that scene in one take.

October 5, 2009 | Posted in History and Culture | Comments closed

Friday Buffet

Not sure how I missed this awesome photo spread of refrigerator contents, but I’m just glad we’re together now. Bonus points to the first person to find the truly bizarre item inside one freezer (hint: eek!).

— —

Here’s a priveleged response to traylessness at Stanford (where trays are still available on request). In my opinion, there are a few legit gripes about not having trays, but this writer hits none of them. I quite enjoyed this comment in response:

I’m sorry you have to request a tray instead of being handed one. I guess you’re used to being handed things in your life. Go away.

— —

But that’s just one viewpoint on campus… The Stanford Project on Nutrition (SPOON) more than makes up for the above sillyness with their mid-90s video on food recovery. All that’s missing is a soundtrack with period music from Alanis or Hootie. On second thought, it’s perfect.

And for more current news, SPOON recently joined the blogosphere.
— —

On the other side of the globe, here’s one man’s take on food waste in India.

— —

Honestly, who wastes milk on purpose? You don’t see OPEC spraying oil on the ground to keep supply at the right level. What’s that? Milk is perishable? Rrrrright. But still…

October 2, 2009 | Posted in College, Farm, Friday Buffet, Household, International, Trayless | Comments closed